Multi-touch gestures such as pinch-to-zoom, two-finger scroll, rotate and press were swift and responsive as were three-finger press and flicks. We liked the feel of the small raised dots of the touchpad against our fingers. The 2.75 x 1.5-inch touchpad is small, but pleasant to use. TIME IS OF THE ESSENCE Notebook system response time, performance, and durabil. The only thing preventing the T430 from offering a perfect typing experience is the plastic palm rest. LENOVO THINKPAD T430 When it comes to your. The T430 can have much more memory populated. The T330 only supports unbuffered DIMMs, the T430 supports buffered DIMMs. The main difference between the T330 and T430 is memory. You can configure the servers to be nearly identical, but the T430 should have a higher maximum possible configuration. The rubberized ABS plastic lid, carbon-reinforced bottom and internal roll cage help protect against shocks and drops. Also, the base feature set may be different. Include strong chrome hinges and the Lenovo and ThinkPad insignias in the top The ThinkPad T430's lid is outfitted in theĭurable, yet extremely comfortable, black soft-touch finish. These mobile workspaces offer a high standard of sturdiness, If you are on the go, you may prefer the s.The ThinkPads from Lenovo (earlier ÏBM) are still the ultimate mobile work laptops for many This is a side-by-side comparison of the specs of the ThinkPad T420 vs. The 's' is much thinner/lighter whereas non s is more the traditional chunky thinkpad design. The big picture would be more what form factor would you prefer. Even in Skylake the I5-6260U can perform very similar to the i7-6500U in CPU tasks because CPUs with Iris Graphics have L4 cache which the CPU can also utilize speeding up tasks and negate some of the clock speed deficit. I mean it's not going to play games at high settings but the 4000 was a big generational leap for Intel so it's up to 40-50% faster than Sandy bridge.īesides as you say just cause it says i7 doesn't mean it's the best. Typically, each gen of i5 performs similarly to the previous i7.Īlso Intel 4000 is much faster than Intel 3000 and is still supported by Intel driver wise. I don't see why it should have been 'faster' in the first place. Performance wise, the 3320 does better on synthetics but in real life, they are almost dead even so no, the 2620m is not 'faster'. Did 'faster' to imply it's probably no diff hence the ''

T420 t430 comparison